EU Lawmakers Condemn Serbia's 'Disturbing' Mladic Funeral
European Parliamentarians have sharply rebuked Serbia over the funeral of Ratko Mladic, the convicted Bosnian Serb military commander, calling the public display deeply disturbing. The ceremony, held in Belgrade with full military honors, drew immediate criticism from across the EU political spectrum, with lawmakers questioning what the spectacle says about Serbia's commitment to confronting its wartime past.
The criticism is not merely symbolic. For many in Brussels, the funeral represents a troubling signal that elements of the Serbian state remain willing to glorify figures convicted of genocide and crimes against humanity. Mladic, who was found guilty by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, remains a polarizing figure — a hero to some nationalists, but a symbol of atrocity to victims and survivors across the region. The decision to accord him a state-style farewell, rather than a quiet burial, suggests a continued reluctance to fully reckon with the legacy of the 1990s wars.
A Test for Serbia's European Path
The episode arrives at a delicate moment for Serbia's European Union accession process. Brussels has long insisted that normalization with its neighbors and a genuine reckoning with wartime crimes are prerequisites for membership. By allowing the funeral to become a public spectacle, Belgrade risks undermining the credibility of its reform agenda, handing ammunition to EU member states already skeptical of further enlargement.
Beyond the EU corridors, the fallout is being felt acutely in the wider Balkans. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, where Mladic's forces committed the Srebrenica massacre, and in Kosovo, where memories of the conflict remain raw, the funeral has been met with anger and anxiety. Regional leaders warn that such displays of reverence for convicted war criminals embolden nationalist narratives and complicate already fragile reconciliation efforts. For the EU, the challenge is clear: whether to treat the funeral as an isolated incident or as evidence of a deeper, unresolved problem in Serbia's relationship with its own history.